Saving Behavior and Portfolio Choice After Retirement (2024)

Abstract

This paper reviews the literature on saving behavior and portfolio choice after retirement and provides a descriptive analysis of this behavior by Dutch elderly households. Studying saving behavior in the Netherlands is informative because of the very different institutional background compared to the US, for which most of the empirical evidence is. In the Netherlands, the generous pension system and almost complete coverage of the public health- and long-term care insurance system makes precautionary saving less necessary. Using detailed administrative data, we present evidence on the extent to which the financial resources of retirees are affected by shocks such as the decease of a spouse or deteriorating health—similar to recent empirical studies by Poterba et al. (Explorations in the economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 23–69, 2011; Investigations in the economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 21–69, 2012; Discoveries in the economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 159–186, 2014) for the US. Moreover, we examine the extent to which retirees who do not experience any shocks are able to keep positive wealth at their disposal and sustain their consumption level during retirement. Our results show that the death of the spouse results in a significant reduction of household wealth compared to surviving couples—which is also found in the US—while health shocks result in higher household savings in old-age due to the almost complete coverage of health care expenditures. Although retirees in the Netherlands face limited uncertainty about health expenditures, our analysis shows that the elderly, on average, keep large amounts of assets even at a very old age. Our findings suggest that (1) the generous pension benefits are protective of household wealth, (2) illiquid housing wealth constrains the decumulation of household wealth, (3) bequests and transfers after the death of the first spouse are important.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)353-404
Number of pages52
JournalDe Economist
Volume163
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2015

Keywords

  • Elderly
  • Portfolio choice
  • Savings

Access to Document

  • savingFinal published version, 877 KB

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Saving Behavior and Portfolio Choice After Retirement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this

    • APA
    • Author
    • BIBTEX
    • Harvard
    • Standard
    • RIS
    • Vancouver

    van Ooijen, R., Alessie, R. (2015). Saving Behavior and Portfolio Choice After Retirement. De Economist, 163(3), 353-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-015-9254-z

    van Ooijen, Raun ; Alessie, Rob ; Kalwij, Adriaan. / Saving Behavior and Portfolio Choice After Retirement. In: De Economist. 2015 ; Vol. 163, No. 3. pp. 353-404.

    @article{cd35b9b9e9ea4a0c9402c3f952d94911,

    title = "Saving Behavior and Portfolio Choice After Retirement",

    abstract = "This paper reviews the literature on saving behavior and portfolio choice after retirement and provides a descriptive analysis of this behavior by Dutch elderly households. Studying saving behavior in the Netherlands is informative because of the very different institutional background compared to the US, for which most of the empirical evidence is. In the Netherlands, the generous pension system and almost complete coverage of the public health- and long-term care insurance system makes precautionary saving less necessary. Using detailed administrative data, we present evidence on the extent to which the financial resources of retirees are affected by shocks such as the decease of a spouse or deteriorating health—similar to recent empirical studies by Poterba et al. (Explorations in the economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 23–69, 2011; Investigations in the economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 21–69, 2012; Discoveries in the economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 159–186, 2014) for the US. Moreover, we examine the extent to which retirees who do not experience any shocks are able to keep positive wealth at their disposal and sustain their consumption level during retirement. Our results show that the death of the spouse results in a significant reduction of household wealth compared to surviving couples—which is also found in the US—while health shocks result in higher household savings in old-age due to the almost complete coverage of health care expenditures. Although retirees in the Netherlands face limited uncertainty about health expenditures, our analysis shows that the elderly, on average, keep large amounts of assets even at a very old age. Our findings suggest that (1) the generous pension benefits are protective of household wealth, (2) illiquid housing wealth constrains the decumulation of household wealth, (3) bequests and transfers after the death of the first spouse are important.",

    keywords = "Elderly, Portfolio choice, Savings",

    author = "{van Ooijen}, Raun and Rob Alessie and Adriaan Kalwij",

    year = "2015",

    month = oct,

    day = "1",

    doi = "10.1007/s10645-015-9254-z",

    language = "English",

    volume = "163",

    pages = "353--404",

    journal = "De Economist",

    issn = "0013-063X",

    publisher = "Springer",

    number = "3",

    }

    van Ooijen, R, Alessie, R 2015, 'Saving Behavior and Portfolio Choice After Retirement', De Economist, vol. 163, no. 3, pp. 353-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-015-9254-z

    Saving Behavior and Portfolio Choice After Retirement. / van Ooijen, Raun; Alessie, Rob; Kalwij, Adriaan.
    In: De Economist, Vol. 163, No. 3, 01.10.2015, p. 353-404.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Saving Behavior and Portfolio Choice After Retirement

    AU - van Ooijen, Raun

    AU - Alessie, Rob

    AU - Kalwij, Adriaan

    PY - 2015/10/1

    Y1 - 2015/10/1

    N2 - This paper reviews the literature on saving behavior and portfolio choice after retirement and provides a descriptive analysis of this behavior by Dutch elderly households. Studying saving behavior in the Netherlands is informative because of the very different institutional background compared to the US, for which most of the empirical evidence is. In the Netherlands, the generous pension system and almost complete coverage of the public health- and long-term care insurance system makes precautionary saving less necessary. Using detailed administrative data, we present evidence on the extent to which the financial resources of retirees are affected by shocks such as the decease of a spouse or deteriorating health—similar to recent empirical studies by Poterba et al. (Explorations in the economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 23–69, 2011; Investigations in the economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 21–69, 2012; Discoveries in the economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 159–186, 2014) for the US. Moreover, we examine the extent to which retirees who do not experience any shocks are able to keep positive wealth at their disposal and sustain their consumption level during retirement. Our results show that the death of the spouse results in a significant reduction of household wealth compared to surviving couples—which is also found in the US—while health shocks result in higher household savings in old-age due to the almost complete coverage of health care expenditures. Although retirees in the Netherlands face limited uncertainty about health expenditures, our analysis shows that the elderly, on average, keep large amounts of assets even at a very old age. Our findings suggest that (1) the generous pension benefits are protective of household wealth, (2) illiquid housing wealth constrains the decumulation of household wealth, (3) bequests and transfers after the death of the first spouse are important.

    AB - This paper reviews the literature on saving behavior and portfolio choice after retirement and provides a descriptive analysis of this behavior by Dutch elderly households. Studying saving behavior in the Netherlands is informative because of the very different institutional background compared to the US, for which most of the empirical evidence is. In the Netherlands, the generous pension system and almost complete coverage of the public health- and long-term care insurance system makes precautionary saving less necessary. Using detailed administrative data, we present evidence on the extent to which the financial resources of retirees are affected by shocks such as the decease of a spouse or deteriorating health—similar to recent empirical studies by Poterba et al. (Explorations in the economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 23–69, 2011; Investigations in the economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 21–69, 2012; Discoveries in the economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 159–186, 2014) for the US. Moreover, we examine the extent to which retirees who do not experience any shocks are able to keep positive wealth at their disposal and sustain their consumption level during retirement. Our results show that the death of the spouse results in a significant reduction of household wealth compared to surviving couples—which is also found in the US—while health shocks result in higher household savings in old-age due to the almost complete coverage of health care expenditures. Although retirees in the Netherlands face limited uncertainty about health expenditures, our analysis shows that the elderly, on average, keep large amounts of assets even at a very old age. Our findings suggest that (1) the generous pension benefits are protective of household wealth, (2) illiquid housing wealth constrains the decumulation of household wealth, (3) bequests and transfers after the death of the first spouse are important.

    KW - Elderly

    KW - Portfolio choice

    KW - Savings

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938418160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s10645-015-9254-z

    DO - 10.1007/s10645-015-9254-z

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84938418160

    SN - 0013-063X

    VL - 163

    SP - 353

    EP - 404

    JO - De Economist

    JF - De Economist

    IS - 3

    ER -

    van Ooijen R, Alessie R, Kalwij A. Saving Behavior and Portfolio Choice After Retirement. De Economist. 2015 Oct 1;163(3):353-404. doi: 10.1007/s10645-015-9254-z

    Saving Behavior and Portfolio Choice After Retirement (2024)
    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: Cheryll Lueilwitz

    Last Updated:

    Views: 5413

    Rating: 4.3 / 5 (54 voted)

    Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Cheryll Lueilwitz

    Birthday: 1997-12-23

    Address: 4653 O'Kon Hill, Lake Juanstad, AR 65469

    Phone: +494124489301

    Job: Marketing Representative

    Hobby: Reading, Ice skating, Foraging, BASE jumping, Hiking, Skateboarding, Kayaking

    Introduction: My name is Cheryll Lueilwitz, I am a sparkling, clean, super, lucky, joyous, outstanding, lucky person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.